- Game theory enforced 4 year cycle attempt definitely in play ✅ - Isolated strength in ZEC by attracting price agnostic buyers ✅ - Fast and strong rally in alts (see VIRTUAL but ZEC applies too ofc) ✅ Played it correctly ❌ An improvement in mid term outlook changed my entire strategy when the right strategy is to be defensive in the short term. Much to improve on but not 0
Outlook for Q4 Structural Forces at Play (What?) - 4 Year Cycle - Q4 Seasonality - Pockets of Isolated Strength - Fast and Strong Rallies Culmination of Factors (So What?) The most logical thing participants with large inventory (funds/individuals/projects themselves) would do is operate within the 4 year cycle framework, as what they do with the tokens create the inflection points, and the door to the exit isn't big enough for everyone. On average, we have ~$1B of alts being unlocked everyday. It makes little sense to stay when you know billions more are leaving balance sheets everyday. That said, because pockets of outperformance has been the norm for the entire cycle, people have been deluded into using this as the prelude to another market wide rally regardless of the evidence around them (it's just not our time yet!). The ill-placed risk appetite means you get more fuel for the market leaders despite being late in the cycle/cycle already over. Lastly, throughout the entire cycle, aside from BTC + AI from last Q4, all rallies/meta ended most of their upside within around 1 month - WIF $300M > $4.8B (37 days, 70% of it was done in 21 days) - Boden $0 > $730M (38 days) - ETH DAT (50 days) - PUMP (20 days) etc. etc. The more price agnostic buyers you can attract, the longer it last, but the numbers don't differ enough to change your behavior. Now take into account that we're at cycle end, it warrants more caution. I think this is all very basic to those that are not deluded, but when you're in the weeds it's easy to get lost. Play obvious strength & obvious catalysts, and don't hold unreliable targets.
2,74 mil
0
O conteúdo apresentado nesta página é fornecido por terceiros. Salvo indicação em contrário, a OKX não é o autor dos artigos citados e não reivindica quaisquer direitos de autor nos materiais. O conteúdo é fornecido apenas para fins informativos e não representa a opinião da OKX. Não se destina a ser um endosso de qualquer tipo e não deve ser considerado conselho de investimento ou uma solicitação para comprar ou vender ativos digitais. Na medida em que a IA generativa é utilizada para fornecer resumos ou outras informações, esse mesmo conteúdo gerado por IA pode ser impreciso ou inconsistente. Leia o artigo associado para obter mais detalhes e informações. A OKX não é responsável pelo conteúdo apresentado nos sites de terceiros. As detenções de ativos digitais, incluindo criptomoedas estáveis e NFTs, envolvem um nível de risco elevado e podem sofrer grandes flutuações. Deve considerar cuidadosamente se o trading ou a detenção de ativos digitais é adequado para si à luz da sua condição financeira.