- Game theory enforced 4 year cycle attempt definitely in play ✅ - Isolated strength in ZEC by attracting price agnostic buyers ✅ - Fast and strong rally in alts (see VIRTUAL but ZEC applies too ofc) ✅ Played it correctly ❌ An improvement in mid term outlook changed my entire strategy when the right strategy is to be defensive in the short term. Much to improve on but not 0
Outlook for Q4 Structural Forces at Play (What?) - 4 Year Cycle - Q4 Seasonality - Pockets of Isolated Strength - Fast and Strong Rallies Culmination of Factors (So What?) The most logical thing participants with large inventory (funds/individuals/projects themselves) would do is operate within the 4 year cycle framework, as what they do with the tokens create the inflection points, and the door to the exit isn't big enough for everyone. On average, we have ~$1B of alts being unlocked everyday. It makes little sense to stay when you know billions more are leaving balance sheets everyday. That said, because pockets of outperformance has been the norm for the entire cycle, people have been deluded into using this as the prelude to another market wide rally regardless of the evidence around them (it's just not our time yet!). The ill-placed risk appetite means you get more fuel for the market leaders despite being late in the cycle/cycle already over. Lastly, throughout the entire cycle, aside from BTC + AI from last Q4, all rallies/meta ended most of their upside within around 1 month - WIF $300M > $4.8B (37 days, 70% of it was done in 21 days) - Boden $0 > $730M (38 days) - ETH DAT (50 days) - PUMP (20 days) etc. etc. The more price agnostic buyers you can attract, the longer it last, but the numbers don't differ enough to change your behavior. Now take into account that we're at cycle end, it warrants more caution. I think this is all very basic to those that are not deluded, but when you're in the weeds it's easy to get lost. Play obvious strength & obvious catalysts, and don't hold unreliable targets.
2,72k
0
Innholdet på denne siden er levert av tredjeparter. Med mindre annet er oppgitt, er ikke OKX forfatteren av de siterte artikkelen(e) og krever ingen opphavsrett til materialet. Innholdet er kun gitt for informasjonsformål og representerer ikke synspunktene til OKX. Det er ikke ment å være en anbefaling av noe slag og bør ikke betraktes som investeringsråd eller en oppfordring om å kjøpe eller selge digitale aktiva. I den grad generativ AI brukes til å gi sammendrag eller annen informasjon, kan slikt AI-generert innhold være unøyaktig eller inkonsekvent. Vennligst les den koblede artikkelen for mer detaljer og informasjon. OKX er ikke ansvarlig for innhold som er vert på tredjeparts nettsteder. Beholdning av digitale aktiva, inkludert stablecoins og NFT-er, innebærer en høy grad av risiko og kan svinge mye. Du bør nøye vurdere om handel eller innehav av digitale aktiva passer for deg i lys av din økonomiske tilstand.