- Game theory enforced 4 year cycle attempt definitely in play ✅
- Isolated strength in ZEC by attracting price agnostic buyers ✅
- Fast and strong rally in alts (see VIRTUAL but ZEC applies too ofc) ✅
Played it correctly ❌
An improvement in mid term outlook changed my entire strategy when the right strategy is to be defensive in the short term.
Much to improve on but not 0
Outlook for Q4
Structural Forces at Play (What?)
- 4 Year Cycle
- Q4 Seasonality
- Pockets of Isolated Strength
- Fast and Strong Rallies
Culmination of Factors (So What?)
The most logical thing participants with large inventory (funds/individuals/projects themselves) would do is operate within the 4 year cycle framework, as what they do with the tokens create the inflection points, and the door to the exit isn't big enough for everyone. On average, we have ~$1B of alts being unlocked everyday. It makes little sense to stay when you know billions more are leaving balance sheets everyday.
That said, because pockets of outperformance has been the norm for the entire cycle, people have been deluded into using this as the prelude to another market wide rally regardless of the evidence around them (it's just not our time yet!).
The ill-placed risk appetite means you get more fuel for the market leaders despite being late in the cycle/cycle already over.
Lastly, throughout the entire cycle, aside from BTC + AI from last Q4, all rallies/meta ended most of their upside within around 1 month
- WIF $300M > $4.8B (37 days, 70% of it was done in 21 days)
- Boden $0 > $730M (38 days)
- ETH DAT (50 days)
- PUMP (20 days)
etc. etc.
The more price agnostic buyers you can attract, the longer it last, but the numbers don't differ enough to change your behavior. Now take into account that we're at cycle end, it warrants more caution. I think this is all very basic to those that are not deluded, but when you're in the weeds it's easy to get lost.
Play obvious strength & obvious catalysts, and don't hold unreliable targets.
2,76 mil
0
El contenido de esta página lo proporcionan terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es el autor de los artículos citados y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo vinculado para obtener más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. El holding de activos digitales, incluyendo stablecoins y NFT, implican un alto grado de riesgo y pueden fluctuar en gran medida. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti a la luz de tu situación financiera.

