#UXLINK @UXLINKofficial This project team is quite ridiculous. I initially felt sympathy for the theft situation, but their compensation plan for users is simply unheard of. It's a very simple matter: first exclude the on-chain inflation part, and for each exchange, just replace according to the number of coins they have. Exchange users can exchange 1:1 based on their holdings. Those who didn't sell before and after the theft can naturally get their new coins, and those who bought can also exchange 1:1 based on their holdings; for the on-chain part, it can be done according to a snapshot, as the on-chain data is clear and transparent. For the inflation part, compensation can be made according to a certain ratio. Then, they could burn a portion of their team's tokens. I believe everyone can understand this. Instead, the project team keeps making foolish moves. If you take a snapshot on a previous date at a centralized exchange, what about the users who bought later? Should they just take the loss and be dumped on? Also, @Bybit_Official @BybitAlpha if you are taking a snapshot based on time, then why have you been able to trade all along! Since your exchange allows trading, you let the trading users take the risk on this coin, and then you ignore them while compensating those who were in the snapshot. Who will make up for the losses of the users who bought the coins? @benbybit $UXLINK