- Game theory enforced 4 year cycle attempt definitely in play ✅ - Isolated strength in ZEC by attracting price agnostic buyers ✅ - Fast and strong rally in alts (see VIRTUAL but ZEC applies too ofc) ✅ Played it correctly ❌ An improvement in mid term outlook changed my entire strategy when the right strategy is to be defensive in the short term. Much to improve on but not 0
Outlook for Q4 Structural Forces at Play (What?) - 4 Year Cycle - Q4 Seasonality - Pockets of Isolated Strength - Fast and Strong Rallies Culmination of Factors (So What?) The most logical thing participants with large inventory (funds/individuals/projects themselves) would do is operate within the 4 year cycle framework, as what they do with the tokens create the inflection points, and the door to the exit isn't big enough for everyone. On average, we have ~$1B of alts being unlocked everyday. It makes little sense to stay when you know billions more are leaving balance sheets everyday. That said, because pockets of outperformance has been the norm for the entire cycle, people have been deluded into using this as the prelude to another market wide rally regardless of the evidence around them (it's just not our time yet!). The ill-placed risk appetite means you get more fuel for the market leaders despite being late in the cycle/cycle already over. Lastly, throughout the entire cycle, aside from BTC + AI from last Q4, all rallies/meta ended most of their upside within around 1 month - WIF $300M > $4.8B (37 days, 70% of it was done in 21 days) - Boden $0 > $730M (38 days) - ETH DAT (50 days) - PUMP (20 days) etc. etc. The more price agnostic buyers you can attract, the longer it last, but the numbers don't differ enough to change your behavior. Now take into account that we're at cycle end, it warrants more caution. I think this is all very basic to those that are not deluded, but when you're in the weeds it's easy to get lost. Play obvious strength & obvious catalysts, and don't hold unreliable targets.
2,77 k
0
Le contenu de cette page est fourni par des tiers. Sauf indication contraire, OKX n’est pas l’auteur du ou des articles citĂ©s et ne revendique aucun droit d’auteur sur le contenu. Le contenu est fourni Ă  titre d’information uniquement et ne reprĂ©sente pas les opinions d’OKX. Il ne s’agit pas d’une approbation de quelque nature que ce soit et ne doit pas ĂȘtre considĂ©rĂ© comme un conseil en investissement ou une sollicitation d’achat ou de vente d’actifs numĂ©riques. Dans la mesure oĂč l’IA gĂ©nĂ©rative est utilisĂ©e pour fournir des rĂ©sumĂ©s ou d’autres informations, ce contenu gĂ©nĂ©rĂ© par IA peut ĂȘtre inexact ou incohĂ©rent. Veuillez lire l’article associĂ© pour obtenir davantage de dĂ©tails et d’informations. OKX n’est pas responsable du contenu hĂ©bergĂ© sur des sites tiers. La dĂ©tention d’actifs numĂ©riques, y compris les stablecoins et les NFT, implique un niveau de risque Ă©levĂ© et leur valeur peut considĂ©rablement fluctuer. Examinez soigneusement votre situation financiĂšre pour dĂ©terminer si le trading ou la dĂ©tention d’actifs numĂ©riques vous convient.